I have always wondered what the disclosures mean. Financial disclosure, to my understanding, means that no sums of money are involved in the publishing of the manuscript.
If a funding organisation has offered grants to a researcher that leads to publication, is the researcher acting as an “agent” of that organisation by researching what the agency wants?
There’s always an agenda.
Conflicts of interest sound more fanciful. It is a philosophical argument that seems like more of an afterthought and a subtle print as a footnote. I believe that most readers have turned a blind eye to this relative obscurity. I am also surprised that people in conferences often highlight this, but I digress. It is a matter of personal preference.
I think that the time has now come to be more comprehensive about the research agendas as well as identify motivation behind publications. This post was triggered by an innocuous write up in one “prestigious journal” where the lead author had pushed for a particular technological breakthrough in the healthcare system (Disclosure: I don’t want to highlight it for fear of reprisals!). One of the names that caught my eye was a company I had previously aliased. I was keen to bring in the same technology in India and report it’s suitability for Indian conditions. The executives decided not to implement it (and that’s another story!)
But how many people aware that the company in disclosure has precisely the same division working to popularise the health care intervention listed in the article? I have my genuine doubts because it is very niche.
Hint: Most users are unaware of who manufactures the innards of mobile devices.
I think it is time to explain these disclosures comprehensively in the context of the article.